(6) state or imply an
ability to influence improperly any tribunal, legislative body, government agency or
official; (7) assist a judge or judicial
officer in conduct that the lawyer knows is a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct;
(8) avoid in bad faith the repayment of an
education loan guaranteed by the Illinois Student Assistance Commission or other
governmental entity. The lawful discharge of an educational loan in a bankruptcy
proceeding shall not constitute bad faith under this rule, but the discharge shall not
preclude a review of the attorney's conduct to determine if it constitutes bad faith; or
(9)(A) violate a Federal, State or local statute
or ordinances that prohibits discrimination based on race, sex, religion, or national
origin by conduct that reflects adversely on the lawyer's fitness as a lawyer. Whether a
discriminatory act reflects adversely on a lawyer's fitness as a lawyer shall be
determined after consideration of all the circumstances, including
(1) the seriousness of the act,
(2) whether the lawyer knew that it was
prohibited by statute orordinance,
(3) whether it was part of a pattern of
prohibited conduct, and
(4) whether it was committed in connection with
the lawyer's professional activities.
(B) No complaint of professional misconduct based
on an unlawfully discriminatory act, pursuant to paragraph (9)(A) of this rule, may be
broughtuntil a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction has found that the
lawyer has engaged in an unlawfully discriminatory act, and that the determination of the
court or administrative agency has become final and enforceable and the right of judicial
review of the determination has been exhausted.
(b) A lawyer who holds public office shall not:
(1) use that office to obtain, or attempt to
obtain, a special advantage in a legislative matter for a client under circumstances where
the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that such action is not in the public interest;
(2) use that office to influence, or attempt to
influence, a tribunal to act in favor of a client; or
(3) represent any client, including a municipal
corporation or other public body, in the promotion or defeat of legislative or other
proposals pending before the public body of which such lawyer is a member or by which such
lawyer is employed.
(c) A lawyer who holds public office may accept
political campaign contributions as permitted by law.
Adopted February 8, 1990, effective August 1,
1990; amended June 29, 1990; effective July 1, 1990; amended October 15, 1993, effective
immediately.
Rule 8.5. Disciplinary Authority; Choice of
Law
(a) Disciplinary Authority. A lawyer admitted to
practice in this jurisdiction is subject to the disciplinary authority of this
jurisdiction, regardless of where the lawyer's conduct occurs. A lawyer may be subject,
for the same conduct, to the disciplinary authority of both this jurisdiction and another
jurisdiction where the lawyer is admitted.
(b) Choice of Law. In any exercise of the
disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction, the Rules of Professional Conduct to be
applied shall be as follows:
(1) for conduct in connection with a proceeding
in a court before which a lawyer has been admitted to practice (either generally or for
purposes of that proceeding), the rules to be applied shall be the rules of the
jurisdiction in which the court sits, unless the rules of the court provide otherwise; and
(2) for any other conduct, (i) if the lawyer is
licensed to practice only in this jurisdiction, the rules to be applied shall be the rules
of this jurisdiction, and
(ii) if the lawyer is licensed to practice in
this and another jurisdiction, the rules to be applied shall be the rules of the admitting
jurisdiction in which the lawyer principally practices; provided, however, that if
particular conduct clearly has its predominant effect in another jurisdiction in which the
lawyer is licensed to practice, the rules of that jurisdiction shall be applied to that
conduct.
Adopted February 8, 1990, effective August 1,
1990; amended February 14, 1995, effective immediately.
Comment
(February 14, 1995)
(a) Source
The first sentence of Rule 8.5 is substantially
equivalent to the rule as originally issued on February 8, 1990, to be effective August 1,
1990, which read as follows: "A lawyer admitted to practice in this jurisdiction is
subject to the disciplinary authority of this jurisdiction although engaged in practice
elsewhere." This language was identical with the American Bar Association (ABA) Model
Rule language as it then stood. The present language of Illinois Rule 8.5 is substantially
identical with the present ABA Model Rule language, as amended August 11, 1993. The ABA
Model Rule language is followed by an extensive "Comment" which is not adopted
in Illinois.
(b) Illinois Code of Professional Responsibility
Provisions. The Illinois Code had no provisions relating to this subject.
(c) Other Comment: Paragraph (a) restates
longstanding law. Nothing contained in Rule 8.5 abrogates the jurisdiction of the Illinois
courts or the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission over Illinois lawyers no
matter where they practice: the rule simply directs which law or code of conduct should
guide an Illinois tribunal when dealing with attorney conduct in an interstate
transaction. The rule does not purport to direct such tribunals when the transaction in
question involves jurisdictions outside the United States. In subparagraph (b)(2)(ii), the
"jurisdiction in which the lawyer principally practices" refers to the
jurisdiction in which the lawyer's principal office is located; the provisions of the
subparagraph relating to the "predominant effect" of "particular
conduct" shall apply solely to circumstances where there is a single jurisdiction, in
which the lawyer is licensed, which experiences that
"predominant effect." Where no such
single jurisdiction can be determined, as in a large multistate transaction, then the
applicable rules of conduct would be those of the jurisdiction of principal practice.